Skip to content

Chapter 6: What Makes a Good Research Venue?

“Not all conferences are created equal. Where you publish speaks just as loudly as what you publish.”

Why This Chapter Matters

When you finally finish your paper, one big question remains:
Where should you submit it?

Choosing the wrong venue can waste months of effort, get your work buried, or worse—tie your name to a predatory publisher.
On the flip side, choosing the right venue gives your work credibility, visibility, and a strong citation trail.

This chapter will help you understand how to evaluate research venues—whether you’re reading, citing, or submitting.

Conceptual Breakdown

🔹 Journal vs. Conference: Strategic Decisions

In CS, top-tier conferences often rival or surpass journals in prestige.

Scenario Best Venue Type
Fast turnaround, live presentation Conference
Polished, long-form theoretical work Journal
Early ideas or experimental results Workshop / arXiv
Mandatory publication for thesis defense Journal (check dept)

⚖️ Some universities require a journal for graduation—even if a conference is more respected in your subfield. Always check local policies.

🔹 Understanding Venue Ranking Systems

Here are the most widely used ranking systems in CS:

✅ Don’t obsess over rankings—but do avoid venues with no traceable reputation.

🔹 Signs of a Good Venue

A strong conference or journal usually has:

  • A reputable publisher (IEEE, ACM, Springer, etc.)
  • A visible website with clear dates and scope
  • A known program committee or editorial board
  • Clear review policies (single-blind, double-blind, etc.)
  • Past proceedings on DBLP, IEEE Xplore, or ACM DL

🔍 Look for: Does it have past papers by respected researchers in your field?

🔹 Red Flags: Low-Quality or Predatory Venues

Watch out for:

  • Spammy conference invites in your email
  • Unrealistically fast deadlines or guaranteed acceptance
  • No peer review or suspiciously short turnaround times
  • Conference websites that look unprofessional or copy-pasted
  • High submission fees with no real visibility

❌ If it feels like a diploma mill for papers—it probably is.

🔹 Tips for Beginners: Start Small, Think Forward

If this is your first paper, consider:

  • Targeting workshops or student tracks in major conferences
  • Submitting to regional or national venues before going international
  • Co-authoring with your advisor on their venue of choice
  • Checking acceptance rates and paper length requirements before writing

Remember: Every research journey has to start somewhere.
Better to publish a solid paper in a modest venue than aim too high and publish nothing.

Self-Check Questions

  1. Have you identified 2–3 target venues for your thesis or current project?
  2. What is their acceptance rate? Are they indexed in DBLP or Google Scholar?
  3. Can you access and read past proceedings to benchmark your own work?

Try This Exercise

Venue Comparison Table
Create a table like this for any 2–3 venues you’re considering:

Venue Name Publisher Type Ranking (CORE/h5) Avg. Acceptance Rate Submission Deadline Notes
ExampleConf IEEE Conf A A (CORE) / 112 (h5) 18% Jan 15 NLP flagship conf

This will help you choose wisely before you start writing.

Researcher’s Compass

In research, visibility is credibility. Where you publish affects:

  • Who reads your work
  • How often it’s cited
  • How it's judged during job or funding evaluations

Don’t just aim to publish. Aim to publish where it matters—for your field, your growth, and your voice.